Page Header
Houston Area Texas - FreeRepublic.com

Houston Area Texans
The Houston Chapter of The FreeRepublic Network
In Alliance with FreeRepublic.com

"Capitalism, Self Reliance and Individual Achievement"

Main Menu

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Forum | Donate
Resources | Community Involvement | Commentary | Privacy

 

 

Commentary
- Back -

Missing and Feared Lost: Dems


The other night I was fortunate enough to stumble upon the Charlie Rose show and caught most of his interview with new Democrat Minority Whip Nancy Pelosi. I say 'fortunate' because after watching her, I now realize how great the Republican victory on November 5th was. I now realize how destitute the Democratic Party really is to have had to resort to electing her Minority Leader. It is now obvious to me that she has no idea what the Democrats message is and what they stand for. She even said so herself! She admitted their message not only didn't get out during the midterm election campaigns, but that there was no message. Charlie did everything he could to get her to repeat the criticisms of the Bush Administration that we all heard so much of but she was forced to take the high road, admit failure, and vow to "work with the President" in the future. I know that won't happen but it gave me a good laugh anyway.

I also realized how poor a speaker she really is. She seemed totally dumbfounded by some of Charlie's questions, staring blankly like a deer in headlights for several seconds before answering with unintelligible and incoherent ramblings that came nowhere near an actual point. I almost felt sorry for her. It was like watching a bad high school debate team that was totally unprepared for any of the questions and made up answers on the spot.

If she is the best the Democrats have to offer, Republicans need worry about defeat in the next round of elections only if they shoot themselves in the foot and fail to deliver on what America entrusted them to do.

The other newsworthy gaffe by the Democratic Party in the last week was, of course, Tom Daschle's idiotic remark concerning talk radio. Rush Limbaugh can only wish he were as powerful as Tommy alleged and was another sign the Democrats are totally lost. Daschle is obviously in denial and is playing the blame game as liberals typically do when they lose. I dare them to come up with their version of Sean Hannity or Michael Savage and try to compete. Their problem is it would have to be a 15 or 30-minute show due to lack of meaningful content.

If it weren't for the mindless sheep that follow them, we might have to put their mascot donkey on a milk carton, because it appears they're totally lost. I say sheep because I read plenty of editorials in the papers that almost repeat verbatim the accusations the Democrats make towards Republicans. You know the list; Republicans are going to gut Social Security, Bush is losing the war on terrorism, Bush is a warmonger only interested in protecting the country's oil interests, Bush is responsible for the poor economy, blah blah blah. (Actually the economy's steadily improving if you're watching the Dow and Al Gore admitted the recession began in March 2000 on Clinton's watch.) Letters to the editor aren't any better as it appears most people aren't willing to study the facts and accept as gospel what the talking heads on the TV news tell them.

One major example is the war on terrorism. Daschle says we're losing the war because Osama bin Laden appears to be still alive. Didn't the President tell us in numerous speeches after 9/11 it wasn't just about Osama? Others claim al-Qaida is as strong as ever and have reorganized. Oh, really? Where are they? Most of them are in Guantanamo Bay, the rest are scattered all over the world and aren't pulling off anything compared to what they did pre-9/11. Those that haven't been caught are prisoners wherever they've been forced to hide. And those asking why Saddam and why now? Did not our President tell us this was a global war to root out terrorism wherever it exists? If Saddam, who kills and maims his own people when they defy him, doesn't qualify as a terrorist, who does? Are we to wait for New York or D.C. to turn into a mushroom cloud before we act? Not that we need the U.N. or NATO to approve but we are clearly within our rights to defend ourselves.

Another example is all the people complaining about this new Department of Homeland Security and how this administration is trampling the Bill of Rights and all that garbage. I've read the Homeland Security Act HR 5005 and it says nothing of tracking every purchase, phone call, e-mail, or trip every American makes. Nothing at all. This nonsense came from the liberals who can only succeed by spreading falsehood. The problem is, so many Americans close their eyes and ears and accept it unchallenged.According to Section 202 of the bill, "Directorate for information analysis and infrastructure protection," the undersecretary of Homeland Security is required to: (A) Identify and assess the nature and scope of terrorist threats to the homeland; (B) Detect and identify threats of terrorism against the United States; and (C) Understand such threats in light of actual and potential vulnerabilities of the homeland.

Trust me, all this garbage about how the Bush Administration is about to become the 2002 version of Big Brother is complete nonsense. Had this department existed prior to 9/11, and prevented it, nobody would be complaining. And when, not if, this new Act proves successful, all these arguments will go away and people will see they had nothing to be afraid of. We're at war, and war causes a people to do things differently in order to win the war. If America continues to slide back into the complacency that existed before 9/11, we'll see another, and perhaps larger, terrorist attack on our homeland.

Many have quoted Benjamin Franklin and/or Thomas Jefferson (they aren't such which) as saying, "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." Well that's fine. I have the utmost respect, admiration, and gratitude for our founding fathers. But none of them could have predicted 9/11 and I'm guessing wouldn't have said those things if they had. The Constitution is not written in stone and was made amendable for a reason. I'm sorry, but one man's opinion from more than 200 years ago is just that: one man's opinion. Let's not grant him immortality and ignore real and present dangers we face today. If we're going to throw around quotes from eons ago to justify lack of action, maybe another will cause us to think differently: "He who does not learn from history is doomed to repeat it." Author unknown

Dwight Baker is an engineer for a NASA contractor at the Johnson Space Center.


 The FreeRepublic Network


Main Menu

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Forum | Donate
Resources | Community Involvement | Commentary | Privacy

 

Footer Page

© 2002, 2003 Houston Liberty and The Houston Area Texans
Houston, Texas